No, social media realpy helped people to know about the things they can buy around the world and without the social media less people would be aware of the things they an buy, which would result in less money being collected
Join!
To make our blog as good as possible, we would like to know your opnion about the following statement:
"Do you think that without social media, so no Facebook, Twitter, etc., just TV and radio, the same amount of money would have been collected?"
Please support your answer!
Comment on the statement below.
Join!
comment
Kobe | 30/12/2013
I do not think the same amount would be retrieved, because social media is extremely popular! more people will be reached through these sites ... these may therefore have a very positive impact on such organizations! it ensures that the news spread easily, it generally has a greater effect. so it would be less beneficial when these sites were not there!!!
Jooiiin!!
Ninooo | 30/12/2013
Of course not! Social Media is unfortunately now a more important scource of information than Tv and Radio and now we're living in a world where we cannot live without social media :(
Join!
Mi Rye | 30/12/2013
Yes, I don't think that amount of money would differ that much. Social media is of couse a quick way to spread information, but it's mainly used by young people, below the age of 20 (give or take). Most people donating to charity funds are a lot older and have more money to spend indeed. These people will get involved as well, but due to more reliable and professional sources like TV and radio.
Join !
Malou | 30/12/2013
No, people wants to be quickly informed about actions and status. That can with social media. Transparent and real time via mobile channels.
join!
laar | 30/12/2013
No, messages we put on social media and TV spread so fast around the world, that we could anticipate on things who are not in our environment. And that anticipation makes the real money.
nigguh
youssef | 30/12/2013
No, definitely not! Because many celebrities put on twitter and facebook that they donated money and ask their fanbase to donate as well, this doesn't happen via tv or radio, or at least on a way smaller skill. Social media makes it a lot easier for influential people to get something done, they are more likely to tweet something than to go to a radiostation to ask people to donate.
Join!
Pieter | 30/12/2013
No. The news spread faster and there was more awareness. Also more people donated.
Join!
Timothy | 30/12/2013
No I don't think so because a lot of people nowadays do not watch as much TV anymore and they as mentioned above already, the information is spread much quicker by the use of social media.
30/12/2013
Carlijne | 30/12/2013
No I don't think so the message is spread so fast and all over the world everyone can see it and everyone can help. If a few million people see it and they all decide to donate 10 euros or dollars, it will rise to much more money than if you spread it only across the neighborhood.